Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Psychotraumatol ; 15(1): 2332104, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38629403

ABSTRACT

Background: Individuals suffering from PTSD following childhood abuse represent a large subgroup of patients attending mental health services. The aim of phase-based treatment is to tailor treatment to the specific needs to childhood abuse survivors with PTSD with a Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation (STAIR) phase, in which emotion dysregulation and interpersonal problems are targeted, and a trauma-focused phase.Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare STAIR + Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) vs. STAIR + Narrative Therapy (NT) as treatments for PTSD following childhood-onset trauma in a routine clinical setting.Method: Sixty-eight adults were randomly assigned to STAIR/EMDR (8 STAIR-sessions followed by 12 EMDR-sessions) or STAIR/NT (8 STAIR-sessions followed by 12 NT-sessions). Assessments took place at pre-treatment, after each treatment phase and at 3 and 12 months post-intervention follow-up. Primary outcomes were interviewer-rated and self-reported symptom levels of PTSD. Secondary outcomes included symptom levels of depression and disturbances in emotion regulation and interpersonal skills.Results: Multilevel analyses in the intent-to-treat sample indicated that patients in both treatments improved substantially on PTSD symptom severity (CAPS: d = 0.81 to 1.29; PDS: d = 1.68 to 2.15), as well as on symptom levels of depression, anxiety, emotion regulation, dissociation and interpersonal skills. Effects increased or were maintained until 12-month follow-up. At mid-treatment, after STAIR, patients in both treatments improved moderately on PTSD symptom severity (PDS: d = 1.68 to 2.15), as well as on symptom levels of depression (BDI: d = .32 to .31). Symptoms of anxiety, emotion dysregulation, interpersonal problems and dissociation were not decreased after STAIR. There were no significant differences between the two conditions on any outcome.Conclusion: PTSD in adult survivors of childhood interpersonal trauma can effectively be treated by phase-based interventions using either EMDR or NT in the trauma-processing phase.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01443182..


The study directly compares Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation (STAIR) followed by either EMDR or Narrative Therapy in the trauma-processing phase in routine clinical setting.The brief phase-based treatment was found to be effective in reducing both symptoms of PTSD as well as emotion regulation and interpersonal problems in survivors of childhood abuse.Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in adult survivors of childhood interpersonal trauma can effectively be treated by phase-based interventions using either EMDR or Narrative Therapy in the trauma-processing phase.


Subject(s)
Adult Survivors of Child Abuse , Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing , Narrative Therapy , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Adult , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Treatment Outcome
2.
Psychiatry Res ; 293: 113438, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32905864

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 affects many societies by measures as "social distancing", forcing mental health care professionals to deliver treatments online or via telephone. In this context, online Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is an emerging treatment for patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). We performed a systematic review of studies investigating online EMDR for PTSD. Only one trial was identified. That uncontrolled open trial showed promising results. There is an urgent need to further examine the effects of online EMDR for PTSD, before its wider dissemination is warranted. Remotely delivered cognitive behavioural therapy seems the preferred PTSD-treatment in times of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections , Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing/methods , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Telemedicine/methods , COVID-19 , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Isolation/psychology
3.
J Anxiety Disord ; 57: 48-56, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29804894

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent research indicates that pharmacological agents may enhance psychotherapeutic outcome. Yet, empirical results have not been conclusive with respect to two pharmacological agents, yohimbine hydrochloride (YOH) and propranolol. YOH is suggested to enhance emotional memory by elevating norepinephrine, whereas the ß-adrenergic receptor antagonist propranolol might help better cope with feared situations by reducing accompanying bodily sensations. METHODS: In this controlled trial, fifty-six participants with specific phobia were randomly assigned to either 1) virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) plus YOH, 2) VRET plus Propranolol, or 3) VRET plus placebo. Participants in all conditions received three sessions of VRET over a period of two weeks. RESULTS: We conducted 2 × 3 repeated measures MANOVA's. Results showed a significant effect for time, with partial eta squared ranging from ηp2 = 0.647 to ηp2 = 0.692, for specific phobia, yet no significant interaction effects were found. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found when VRET with YOH or a beta-blocker was compared to VRET with a non-active placebo. Implications for clinical practice and future research are discussed.


Subject(s)
Phobic Disorders/therapy , Propranolol/therapeutic use , Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy/methods , Yohimbine/therapeutic use , Adaptation, Psychological/drug effects , Adult , Aged , Fear/drug effects , Fear/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Phobic Disorders/psychology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...